About Us

REVEAL

It will become the new normal to scientifically qualify in order to neutrally identify an artworks origins and biological DNA. Findings will reveal the chronological identity and historical timeline of both the painting, pigmentation and external framework analysis. 

Whilst the latest science and subsequent scientific validations will be open to art historian opinions and academic interpretations - the latest evolutionary scientific findings and subjectivity will however be evidently portrayed as irrefutable examinations and identifications of an artworks generic and genetic timeline.  

The biological results of the latest DNA findings and genome sequencing is ostensibly the process of determining the complete DNA sequence of an artwork organism's genome at a single time. This entails sequencing all of an organism's chromosomal DNA as well as DNA contained in the mitochondria.  

• The 21st Century Super Laboratory reports will most significantly be a credible
• Factor to reassess the traditional viewpoints and assessments of 
• Past internationally acclaimed experts. 

RETHINK

The artworld is often viewed to to be elitest and has a tendency to stay conservative however the portrayal of privately owned artworks are a valid reason to discuss and debate inclusiveness for Art Education. As a result of science scrutiny in the 21st century - the likelihood of revising historical validations of bygone academic experts tasked with attributions of an artwork will reinforce the need to update duty of care, procedural regulatory aspects to validate an artwork for global art compliance and transparency. The modern and innovative scientific scoping of an artwork is reason enough in determining the origins towards current status thus a clear methodology in 21st century scientific necessity. 

The international art galleries, auction houses and art institutions pride on their obligations and duty of care to make art inclusive and transparent.  If the art institutions value the notion of integrity - it is only fair to suggest an upgrade of formalities towards scientific validation evidence and clarity of artworks publicly exhibited. 

It is a museums policy to exhibit clean and clear artworks for public exhibitions. 

If it is the prerequisite to ensure an artwork is genuine and above board to privately acquire or privately offer per art compliance guidance - any up to date scientific fact based credible reports of a private owners painting certainly enhances it's credibility. 

REBORN

An artwork provenance, documentation literature and bibliography can assist the experts however the latest science reveals far more information than historical data.  In time - perhaps art institutions will embrace impartial scrutiny of protocol therefore a regulation to require publicly exhibited artworks to undergo modern scientific assessments may pose a required amend for revised attribution discussions in order to mitigate past errors of judgement.